<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 10 commandments of Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ps2 Games</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ps2 Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3787</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ps2 Games...&lt;/strong&gt;

very nice blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ps2 Games&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>very nice blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 33rockers</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3786</link>
		<dc:creator>33rockers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3786</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that 770px is a good width for a blog site.

I was pointing out that sites like http://www.cnn.com are starting to widen their sites ouside the 800x600 scope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that 770px is a good width for a blog site.</p>
<p>I was pointing out that sites like <a href="http://www.cnn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com</a> are starting to widen their sites ouside the 800&#215;600 scope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just-me</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3785</link>
		<dc:creator>just-me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3785</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve
What makes you think people devote there whole screen to their browser window? Your current width is OK but any wider and it will be too wide for me. (I&#039;ve got 2960px width desktop)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve<br />
What makes you think people devote there whole screen to their browser window? Your current width is OK but any wider and it will be too wide for me. (I&#8217;ve got 2960px width desktop)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 33rockers</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3784</link>
		<dc:creator>33rockers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3784</guid>
		<description>HI Steve-

as a rule-of-thumb, 770px width is a safe bet for a 800px screen width. Obvously, you have to keep in mind your target viewer. I think we can safely say that 640px screen width is a thing of the past.

Google analytics shows me that the viewers for this site are 100% between the screen resolution of 1024x768 and 1920x1200.  So, in actuality - it would be &quot;safe&quot; for me to target the 1024 pixel width if I wanted to. Many large news sites now go with a 4 column layout, with the 3 main columns fitting into that 770px wide area.

as for the link colors - I am crossing that out ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Steve-</p>
<p>as a rule-of-thumb, 770px width is a safe bet for a 800px screen width. Obvously, you have to keep in mind your target viewer. I think we can safely say that 640px screen width is a thing of the past.</p>
<p>Google analytics shows me that the viewers for this site are 100% between the screen resolution of 1024&#215;768 and 1920&#215;1200.  So, in actuality &#8211; it would be &#8220;safe&#8221; for me to target the 1024 pixel width if I wanted to. Many large news sites now go with a 4 column layout, with the 3 main columns fitting into that 770px wide area.</p>
<p>as for the link colors &#8211; I am crossing that out <img src='http://33rockers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3783</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t follow all of these rules myself, but this page itself scrolls left-right below 600x800, and doesn&#039;t have blue/purple/red link colours...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t follow all of these rules myself, but this page itself scrolls left-right below 600&#215;800, and doesn&#8217;t have blue/purple/red link colours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 33rockers</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3782</link>
		<dc:creator>33rockers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3782</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re right!  The original layout of this site (before I took over) suffers from a little DIV-itis.  I have removed a bunch of the nested divs so that I can control the columns better.

The columns now expand normally when the font-size changes.

thanks for the comment, Jarno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right!  The original layout of this site (before I took over) suffers from a little DIV-itis.  I have removed a bunch of the nested divs so that I can control the columns better.</p>
<p>The columns now expand normally when the font-size changes.</p>
<p>thanks for the comment, Jarno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarno</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>One thing I hate the most is when web designers decide the font size for me. Then when I need to enlarge the font up a notch, the layout of the page goes crazy. See for yourself, this page with Firefox and a control-mousewheel-down action makes the text jump over the darker right column of the page. Reading the content becomes a lot harder.

Other than that, short guidelines on web design are really needed. Yours are pretty good on that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I hate the most is when web designers decide the font size for me. Then when I need to enlarge the font up a notch, the layout of the page goes crazy. See for yourself, this page with Firefox and a control-mousewheel-down action makes the text jump over the darker right column of the page. Reading the content becomes a lot harder.</p>
<p>Other than that, short guidelines on web design are really needed. Yours are pretty good on that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>thanks for the catch, MIke.  Those wierd characters appeared in the place of quotes after I moved the site to another server. Bad character encoding I guess

Fixed now.

-Warren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the catch, MIke.  Those wierd characters appeared in the place of quotes after I moved the site to another server. Bad character encoding I guess</p>
<p>Fixed now.</p>
<p>-Warren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Baley</title>
		<link>http://33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Baley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.33rockers.com/2006/09/27/the-10-commandments-of-web-design/#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>&quot;avoid any content that requires the user to download special, non-standard â€œplug-insâ€ to view your content...&quot;

Do you even proof read what you are trying to say?  Try out your own page on Firefox and see the screwed up font?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;avoid any content that requires the user to download special, non-standard â€œplug-insâ€ to view your content&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you even proof read what you are trying to say?  Try out your own page on Firefox and see the screwed up font?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
